top of page

Parental Authority & Estrangement

  • Writer: Brandon Robbins
    Brandon Robbins
  • 4 days ago
  • 3 min read

Below is a structured, trauma-informed exploration that centers the impact of parental authority overriding a child’s lived experience—especially when parents unilaterally define what is “toxic” and label their own behaviour as “good parenting,” regardless of how it is received.

The Power to Define Reality


When parents decide what is toxic without the child’s participation, they are not just setting boundaries—they are claiming ownership over reality.


This often shows up as:

  • “You’re too sensitive.”

  • “This is for your own good.”

  • “One day you’ll understand.”

  • “That’s just how families are.”


What’s happening beneath the surface is epistemic dominance:

The parents’ interpretation of events is treated as truth, while the child’s perception is treated as error.


Impact on the Child

  • The child learns that their internal signals are unreliable

  • Emotional confusion replaces clarity

  • Trust in self erodes before trust in others ever forms


This is not neutral. It is psychologically shaping.

2. “Good Parenting” as a Shield Against Accountability


When a parent frames their behavior as inherently good because it is parenting, they create moral immunity.

“I can’t be harming you—I’m your parent.”

This framing prevents:

  • Reflection

  • Repair

  • Curiosity about impact

  • Mutual meaning-making


Instead of asking:

“How did this land for you?”

The parent asserts:

“I know what’s best.”

The Harm

  • Pain is reframed as necessary

  • Distress is reframed as immaturity

  • Dissent is reframed as disrespect


The child is left with only two options:

  1. Submit & Disappear

  2. Resist & Be Punished (emotionally or relationally)

When “Toxic” Becomes a Weapon


Parents sometimes name a child’s boundaries, reactions, or autonomy as “toxic.”


Examples:

  • Calling withdrawal “manipulation”

  • Calling anger “abuse”

  • Calling distance “betrayal”

  • Calling differentiation “selfishness”


This inversion is devastating.

Why?

Because it teaches the child:

  • Self-protection = harm

  • Naming pain = attack

  • Boundaries = cruelty


Over time, the child internalizes:

“If I need less of you, I am bad.”

This creates relational double binds—no safe move exists.

Emotional Invalidation as Chronic Injury


This pattern is rarely a single event. It is cumulative.


Each time the child says:

  • “That hurt.”

  • “I felt scared.”

  • “I needed you to stop.”


…and the response is:

  • “That didn’t happen.”

  • “You’re exaggerating.”

  • “You’re ungrateful.”


A small rupture occurs.


Over years, these ruptures stack into:

  • Emotional numbness

  • Hypervigilance

  • Shame for having needs

  • A deep sense of being unseen


This is not resilience building. This is a relational injury.

5. The Slow Road to Estrangement

Estrangement rarely begins with anger. It begins with exhaustion.


The child (or adult child) realizes:

  • Being honest leads to punishment

  • Being quiet leads to erasure

  • Being present requires self-betrayal


Distance becomes the only remaining form of self-preservation.


Estrangement is not:

  • A rejection of love

  • A lack of forgiveness

It is often:

“I tried every way to stay and none of them let me survive.”

The Parent’s Blind Spot


Parents caught in this dynamic often believe:

  • Intent matters more than impact

  • Authority replaces consent

  • Survival parenting = good parenting

  • Estrangement came “out of nowhere”


What is often missing is this truth:

Impact defines harm—not intention, role, or sacrifice.

Without this recognition:

  • Repair cannot occur

  • Apologies feel hollow or conditional

  • Reconnection becomes impossible

What Repair Would Actually Require


Repair is not:

  • Explaining harder

  • Reasserting authority

  • Demanding forgiveness

  • Minimizing the past


Repair would require:

  • Letting the child define what was harmful

  • Tolerating shame without defensiveness

  • Accepting that love and harm can coexist

  • Valuing relationship over being right


For many parents, this is terrifying—because it threatens identity, not just behaviour.

Why Estrangement Becomes Ethical


From the child’s perspective, estrangement may be the first ethical act of their life:

  • Choosing safety over loyalty

  • Choosing truth over harmony

  • Choosing selfhood over role


It is not punishment. It is not revenge. It is containment.

Closing Reflection


When parents define their actions as “good parenting” regardless of impact, they teach the child that:

Love is something done to you, not with you.

Estrangement is often the child’s final attempt to answer:

“If my voice doesn’t matter here, where might it?”

Recent Posts

See All
The Returning Parent

A returning parent is often imagined as a repair. In reality, their return frequently r eactivates grief rather than resolving it. Desertion fractures time: there is the before , the absence , and the

 
 
 
Becoming a Single Parent Through Desertion

When a family is abandoned, the loss has no ceremony and no closure. Desertion is a rupture without acknowledgment. There is no shared decision, no final goodbye, no clear ending—only absence. Becomin

 
 
 
Estrangment & Invisibility

Estrangement and abandonment often leave behind a very specific wound: the experience of being unseen, unheard, and ignored. This is not just loneliness. It is an erosion of existence-as-recognized .

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page